Reconciliatory Revisionism in Costanza Casati’s Clytemnestra (2023): Refiguring Homeric Areté and Mētis through the Dialogics of Gender and Genre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64858/gaudeamus.v5.51Keywords:
genre, refiguration, reconciliation, Clytemnestra, Costanza CasatiAbstract
This article critically examines Costanza Casati’s approach to rewriting key classical hypotexts in Clytemnestra (2024). These texts include Homer’s the Iliad and the Odyssey, Aeschylus’ Agamemnon, Sophocles’ Electra, and Euripides’ Electra and Iphigenia in Aulis. The analysis is theoretically grounded on the dialogue between gender and genre, serving both as a lens for understanding Casati’s literary intervention within the broader reception of Clytemnestra and as a means of articulating her feminist stance within mythological revisionism. I position Clytemnestra as a major development in a longstanding humanising tendency —one that begins with Homer’s fleeting mention of her in the Iliad and in the Odyssey, expands in tragic poetry, and culminates in Casati’s novel— by further amplifying the character’s story and voice. Central to this analysis is the concept of refiguration, which explores how Casati reimagines Clytemnestra’s past as a Spartan princess, resignifies her mētis from a tool of deceit to a means of female agency, and transforms the murders of Agamemnon and Cassandra from acts of vengeance into acts of compassion by situating Clytemnestra within a framework of female heroism that draws upon the heroic code of conduct in the Iliad. The key findings illustrate what I term Casati’s reconciliatory revisionism —characterised by canon expansion, source regeneration, and character rehabilitation— which unfolds through a three-step process: engaging in dialogue with classical sources, incorporating archetypes that have shaped Clytemnestra’s reception, and achieving reconciliation on multiple levels.
References
Aeschylus. 2002. The Oresteia. Translated by Christopher Collard. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, Florence Mary Bennett. 1929. “The Character of Clytemnestra in the Agamemnon of Aeschylus.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 60: 136-154. https://doi.org/10.2307/282814.
—— 1932. “The Character of Clytemnestra in the Choephore and the Eumenides of Aeschylus.” The American Journal of Philology, 53.4: 301-319. https://doi.org/10.2307/290229.
Aristotle. 1920. The Poetics of Aristotle. Edited and translated by S. H. Butcher. London: Macmillan and Co.
Bakhtin, Michael. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Michael Holquist. Ed. Caryl Emerson. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bär, Silvo and Emily Hauser, eds. 2020. Reading Poetry. Writing Genre. English Poetry and Literary Criticism in Dialogue with Classical Scholarship. Oxford: Bloomsbury.
Bauer, Dale M., ed. 1988. Feminist Dialogics: A Theory of Failed Community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Bauman, Zigmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge. UK: Polity Press
Cáceres, Daniel Nisa and Rosario Moreno Soldevila. 2023. “Reescrituras de la épica clásica: panorama de la narrativa de autoría femenina sobre la Guerra de Troya en el siglo XXI.” Ambigua, Revista de Investigaciones sobre Género y Estudios Culturales, 10: 56-72. https://doi.org/10.46661/ambigua.8436.
Casati, Costanza. 2023. Clytemnestra. Dublin: Penguin.
——. 2023. “How Costanza Casati Breathed New Life into Greek Mythology with her Novel Clytemnestra.” Interview by Erica Stephenson. YouTube, September 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZA0Bm96g5E&t=1524s.
Cheney, Patrick and Philip Hardie, eds. 2012. The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Volume 2 (1558-1660). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Clare. “The Voyage Home by Pat Barker —a brilliant finale to the Trojan war trilogy.” Review of The Voyage Home by Pat Barker. The Guardian, August 7, 2024. https://www.theguardian.com/books/article/2024/aug/07/the-voyage-home-by-pat-barker-review-a-brilliant-finale-to-the-trojan-war-trilogy.
Cox, Fiona. 2011. Sibylline Sisters: Virgil’s Presence in Contemporary Women’s Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—— 2018. Ovid’s Presence in Contemporary Women’s Writing: Strange Monsters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—— and Elena Theodorakopoulos. 2013a. “Responding to Homer: Women’s Voices.” Oxford University Press Blog, March 13, 2013. https://blog.oup.com/2013/responding-to-homer-womens-voices/.
—— and Elena Theodorakopoulos. 2013b. “Introduction.” Contemporary Women Writers. Special Issue 2013. https://university.open.ac.uk/arts/research/pvcrs/2013/introduction.
—— and Elena Theodorakopoulos, eds. 2019. Homer’s Daughters. Women’s Responses to Homer in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collard, Christopher. 2002. “Introduction.” Oresteia. By Aeschylus. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Dawson, Lesel and Fiona Mchardy, eds. 2018. Revenge and Gender in Classical, Medieval, and Renaissance Literature. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Duff, David. 2000. “Introduction.” Modern Genre Theory. Ed. David Duff. London and New York: Routledge: 1-24.
Euripides. 2017. Iphigenia in Aulis. Volume 1. Introduction, Text and Translation. Translated by Christopher Collard and James Morwood. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Felson, Nancy and Laura M. Slatkin. 2004. “Gender and Homeric Epic.” The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Ed. Robert Fowler. New York: Cambridge University Press: 91-116.
Gantz, Timothy. 1993. Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Volume 2. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hall, Edith. 2005. “Aeschylus’ Clytemnestra versus her Senecan Tradition.” Agamemnon in Performance. 458 B.C. to AD 2004. Eds. Fiona Macintosh, Michelakis Pantelis, Edith Hall and Oliver Taplin. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 53-76.
Hardwick, Lorna. 2003. Reception Studies, Volume 33: New Surveys in the Classics. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo: Cambridge University Press.
—— and Christopher Stray. 2007. A Companion to Classical Receptions. Maldon and Oxford: Blackwell.
Hauser, Emily. “Since Sappho: Women in Classical Literature and Contemporary Women’s Writing in English.” PhD diss., Yale University, 2017.
—— 2025. A New History of Homer’s World, Through the Women Written Out of It. London: Random House.
Haynes, Natalie. 2020. Pandora’s Jar. Women in Greek Myths. London: Picador.
—— 2020. A Thousand Ships. London: Picador.
—— 2023. Divine Might. Goddesses in Greek Myth. London: Pan Macmillan.
Hesiod. 1914. The Homeric Hymns and Homerica. Translated by Hugh G. Eds. T. E. Page and W. H. D. Rose. London: William Heinemann. New York: The Macmillan Co.
Homer. 2018. The Odyssey. Translated by Emily Wilson. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Co.
Hopkins, David and Charles Martindale, eds. 2012. The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Volume 3: 1660-1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurst, Isobel. 2020. “From Epic to Monologue: Tennyson and Homer.” Reading Poetry. Writing Genre. English Poetry and Literary Criticism in Dialogue with Classical Scholarship. Eds. Silvo Bär and Emily Hauser. Oxford: Bloomsbury: 210-244.
Irish, Bradley J. 2009. “Vengeance, Variously: Revenge Before Kyd in Early Elizabethan Drama.” Early Theatre 12.2: 117-134. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43500640.
James, Paula. 2011. Ovid’s Myth of Pigmalion on Screen. In Pursuit of the Perfect Woman. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Judge, S. E. H. “Contemporary Feminist Adaptations of Greek Myth.” PhD diss., University of Glasgow, 2022.
Katz, Marilyn A. 1994. “The character of Tragedy: Women and the Greek Imagination.” Arethusa 27.1: 81-103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26309598.
Kokolaki, María. 2020. “La compasión y la gloria: el espíritu de la Ilíada.” Revista Acrópolis, 9. Web.<https://revistaacropolis.org/2020/09/09/la-compasion-y-la-gloria-el-espiritu-de-la-iliada/> [Accessed on October 2, 2022]
Komar, Kathleen L. 2003. Reclaiming Klytemnestra: Revenge or Reconciliation. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Liddell, Henry George, and Robert Scott. 1889. Greek-English Lexicon. New York: Harper and Brothers.
MacMillan, H. M. “The Stories We Tell Ourselves to Make Ourselves Come True: Feminist Rewriting in the Canongate Myths Series.” PhD diss., University of Edinburgh, 2019.
Martindale, Charles. 1993. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—— and Richard F. Thomas, eds. 2006. Classics and the Uses of Reception. Malden, Oxford and Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.
Moss, Leonard. 1988. “The Critique of the Female Stereotype in Greek Tragedy.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 71.4: 515-532. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41178448
Opacki, Ireneusz. 2000. “Royal Genres.” Translated by David Malcolm. Modern Genre Theory. Ed. David Duff. Harlow: Longman: 118-26.
Seaford, Richard. 1984. “The Last Bath of Agamemnon.” The Classical Quarterly 34.2: 247-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/638285
Szmigiero, Katarzyna. 2023. “Reflexivity and New Metanarratives. Contemporary English-language Retellings of Classical Mythology.” Discourses on Culture, 20: 85-108. doi: 10.2478/doc-2023-0012.
Wilson, Emily. 2024. “Introduction.” The Iliad. By Homer. Ed. Emily Wilson. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Co: Xi-lxxxviv.
—— 2019. “Epilogue: Translating Homer as a Woman.” Homer’s Daughters. Women’s Responses to Homer in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Eds. Fiona Cox and Elena Theodorakopoulos. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 279-289.
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. 1948. “Clytemnestra and the Vote of Athena.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 68: 130-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/626303
Zeitlin, Froma I. 1978. “The Dynamics of Misogyny: Myth and Mythmaking in the Oresteia.” Arethusa 11.1/2: 149-184. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26308158.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Helena Sánchez Gayoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Also, authors will retain the rights on their work, even if they will be granting Gaudeamus a non-exclusive right of use to reproduce, edit, distribute, publicly communicate and show their work. Therefore, authors are free to engage in additional, independent contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in this journal (such as uploading them to an institutional repository or publishing them in a book), as long as the fact that the manuscripts were first published in this journal is acknowledged.
